Is Xpensiv another coding agent?
No. We review the work before a merge. We show what is still unfinished, with the evidence, and prepare a plan a person can approve.
We check the design, the interface, and the words in a real browser, then wait for a person to approve a plan.
A fast build can still be unready to show.

Later builds got worse. A written fix list went back to the coding agent. These are the measured changes. We did not run the repair.
Lighthouse medians, and a pass at 390px.
A GitHub repository, a preview URL, and a short interview.
Design, interface, copy, and the phone screen, checked in a real browser.
You pick the findings that become a plan. Nothing edits itself.
A coding agent opens the pull request. A person reviews it before it merges.
One app, ready to show. A URL audit, the findings, and one approved plan.
A team shipping every month. Adds the connected repository and reviewed pull requests.
A studio running quality across client work. Adds more than one workspace and a priority queue.
A larger team running quality across many apps. Studio, for more apps at once.
For larger volume. Terms are set in conversation.
Nobody has paid these. An audit can be free. No plan includes unlimited fixes. Plans, on their own page.
No. We review the work before a merge. We show what is still unfinished, with the evidence, and prepare a plan a person can approve.
Design, the interface, the words, the phone layout, accessibility, and performance.
No. You approve the plan first. A person approves before any edit and before a merge.
Next.js and React with Tailwind. Other stacks are not promised.